A Brief History of Feminism and Why It Has Always Been Wrong

Here we go…

caprizchka

Ostensibly launched in order to advance the “rights” (but not responsibilities) of women, Feminism has endeavored to be all things to all women in terms of a universal, one-size-fits-all ideology. However in terms of the achievements by its self-proclaimed adherents, the hype doesn’t match the facts. To speak to a run-of-the-mill feminist is to learn that so long as “men do bad things,” Feminism is necessary. Apparently, the actions of women are beyond reproach while meanwhile the state is virtually infallible in its continued necessity to expand and swallow resources in order to enforce an “equality” of slavery that can never be achieved until all private property and ambition is abolished.

However, to hear history from Feminists, women have always been systematically oppressed by government and a secret cabal known as “The Patriarchy,” which together conspire to keep women from achievement in the social and political realms and from happiness…

View original post 1.420 altre parole

Femicide. A Gender Discourse. Presented at the University of Queensland, SJC Research Day 2014.

FEMICIDE

Daniela Bandelli

Slide1

Today I will be talking about a new word that was introduced let’s say 8 years ago in Italy and enabled a possible reading of an existing social problem.

The new word is femminicidio.

The dominant reading is gender.

The social issue is violence between men and women.

Let’s see where this term comes from.

Slide2

The original word in English is FEMICIDE and has two meanings:

The linguistic /sociological meaning is “homicide of female”.

The political meaning advocated by feminist Diana Russell since 1976 is male homicide of female because she is a woman.

The political meaning then has expanded to the point that femicide is also used to define all sorts of discriminations against women, not necessarily ending with physical death.

Corresponding term in Italy is FEMMICIDIO. This word never erupted in the public sphere and was the preserve of feminists and their associated publications.

In the 1990s Latin…

View original post 1.350 altre parole

Epic Bullying

My body my shirt

Cedar Writes

#Shirtstorm

The Bullies Won

Long Live the Bullies

Who will stand with me for individuality, and freedom of expression?

philae

The bullying started with a ‘reporter’ focusing on an irrelevant detail instead of a monumental human achievement. It ended in triumph for the bullies when the geek who’d been targeted apologized to them in tears, because he was in danger of losing his livelihood if he didn’t kowtow to their desires.

I’m furious. This is simply unacceptable. It is not ok to let the bullies win. I’ve spent years telling my daughters that it’s ok to be different, to not dress like every other girl in school. It’s ok for them to be geeks, to love science, to be in band, to not do what all the cool kids think they ought to do. And now, this comes along and suddenly all the work I have done is set back…

View original post 296 altre parole

Il prelievo forzoso

Si fa sempre più pressante lo spettro del prelievo forzoso. Fenomeno che per me non è un fatto nuovo. Due anni fa alcune persone entrarono in casa mia, senza permesso, e dopo aver ripulito qualche portafoglio, se ne andarono prelevando forzosamente la mia auto.

Pare che qualcuno stia pensando di effettuare tale tipo di prelievo forzoso nei conti correnti degli Italiani. Alcuni ritengono che tale “prelievo” sarà rivolto a tutti gli Italiani, altri ritengono sarà più “equo” e sarà rivolto solo agli Italiani con conto corrente più pingue, cioè superiore a 100,000 €.

Interessante constatare come alcune menti “illuminate” invece di mostrare segni d’insofferenza in toto a tale “prelievo”, ritengano tale misura “eccezionale” più equa se effettuata su conti con maggiore liquidità. Evidentemente sta passando il concetto dello Stato Robin Hood e dei concittadini da derub … da prelevare forzosamente.

Divide et impera.

In realtà un “prelievo forzoso mirato” si connoterebbe come “prelievo forzoso aggravato”.

Mettiamo che il cittadino “Mario Allocco” detenga un conto corrente con giacenza di 200,000 € ma non sia possessore di casa, e la cittadina “Benedetta Dalcielo” abbia una giacenza di 20,000 € e possegga due case, di cui una a rendita d’affitto. Chi dei due ha maggiori capacità contributive?

E mettiamo che la cittadina “Maria Ariposo” abbia una giacenza di 300,000 € in cui conserva i suoi risparmi e conserva il proprio TFR riscosso nell’ultimo licenziamento, e che tale conto le serva per tirare avanti fino al termine dei suoi giorni, anche in virtù di una pensione che non avrà; e il cittadino “Roberto Stotranquillo” invece abbia un conto corrente con 10,000 € ma stipendio fisso pubblico e casa di proprietà. Chi dei due può essere forzatamente prelevato, con minori impatti esistenziali?

In realtà l’articolo 624 del Codice Penale, non fa distinzioni, e ritiene il prelievo forzoso sempre e comunque sanzionabile.

Viceversa il suddetto Codice prevede delle aggravanti o attenuanti per chi effettua il prelievo forzoso. In tali attenuanti può ricadere lo stato di necessità del prelevante.

Ad esempio il prelievo forzoso della mia auto è molto verosimilmente stato effettuato da persone che non avevano uno stipendio di 16,0000 € al mese e vitalizio da 4,000.

Di Europa si può parlare.

It’s not advanced math and rigorous training that keeps women out of STEM. It’s sexist shirts. Watch feminists break the stupid meter.

To feminists, science is about cultivating insanity

judgybitch

stupid_meter

I just have to chime in on the whole #shirtstorm issue, since I do believe this is the single most stupid thing I have ever heard a feminist utter and we all know feminists are capable of breath-taking levels of stupid. But this really does take the cake.  From an article published on The Verge :

I don’t care if you landed a spacecraft on a comet, your shirt is sexist and ostracizing

Yesterday the European Space Agency landed the Philae spacecraft on a comet, a powerful step forward for humanity and science alike. However, slightly before the big moment, coverage of the event reminded us how much progress remains to be accomplished back on Earth.

A team of brilliant scientists landed a rocket on a piece of rock hurtling through space! Let’s say it again: a team of brilliant scientists landed a rocket on a piece of rock hurtling…

View original post 1.111 altre parole

Femen, topless per “brainless”

Si potrebbero spendere mille inutili parole per descrivere i loro intenti, il loro operato, la loro ideologia. E si potrebbe partire dal fatto che sono a busta paga di Soros, filantropo arricchitosi con la vendita allo scoperto di titoli finanziari.

Venditore allo scoperto per vendute scoperte.

Ma qualche immagine spiega meglio di mille parole il loro perché, come pure quello delle Pussy Riot.

slide_271364_1912730_free

Putin vai al diavolo

Ucraina all'Unione Europea

Ucraina all’Unione Europea

“Vada al diavolo Putin” (letteralmente?) perché l'”Ucraina deve andare all’Unione Europea”.

Il nuovo pupazzo di Putin

Il nuovo pupazzo di Putin

L'Ucraina non è libera.

L’Ucraina non è libera.

“Il nuovo pupazzo di Putin”, riferendosi alla possibile successione di Tymosenko a Yanokovic, e quindi l'”Ucraina non sarebbe ancora libera”.

In effetti hanno ragione perché l’Ucraina adesso è in mano a FMI/BCE/World Bank. Il nuovo pupazzo però è americano, made in “Wall Street” la stessa fucina che ha forgiato lo speculatore “allo scoperto” George Soros.

Pardon, volevo dire filantropo.

Italiani tutti evasori

Che spettacolo! Il qualunquismo italiota farcito di parole senza profondità; tutto facilitato dall’imbonitore televisivo di turno, il prototipo dell’uomo nuovo; conto pingue, bella faccia e dietro di essa il nulla, il nulla più assoluto. Il tutto ovviamente in fascia serale, servito su un piatto d’argento serigrafato RAI, per intorpidire le menti del target designato; pensionati e casalinghe abituati a ore di teatrino del dolore e qualche falso buon sentimento.

Ospite d’onore; il “pagamento elettronico”.

Sia inteso, non per rendere più agevoli i pagamenti, ma perché dell’italiano non ci si può fidare.

Perché l’uomo italiano non paga le tasse, non fa lo scontrino, elude, schiva…fa il furbo, il fetentone! E pure se c’è lo scontrino, dai su, lo sanno tutti; paga 10 e sul pezzo di carta c’è scritto 5. E’ un problema culturale, sì è tradizione. Per non parlare della feccia della feccia. Il lavoratore a nero, e il datore di lavoro a nero. Il lavoratore fetentone che pretende di lavorare una giornata per 80 € e tenersi tutto in tasca, e il datore che pretende di pagarlo 80 a nero piuttosto che 40 … in rosso.

Perché se tutti pagassero le tasse, tutti pagheremmo meno, vero? Che poi vuol dire anche  il contrario; se pagassimo meno tasse tutti … eccetera eccetera. Ma andiamo avanti così. 69% di tassazione reale del lavoro è ancora poco. A 80% iniziamo a preoccuparci, forse.

Studi di settore per salassare le partite IVA sulla base di quello che di presume debbano guadagnare. L’Agenzia tassa e Equitalia riscuote; sta a te, fetentone, a dimostrare di non aver guadagnato; noi, intanto, incassiamo. Non ti torna il conto? Non fa niente, hai trenta giorni, dopo di ché la mora e il 30% d’interesse. Come dici? L’usuraro fa il 20%? Se non ti sta bene, smetti di lavorare, tanto non sei capace!

Eh, beh, grande invenzione lo studio di settore ovviamente concepito da parte di chi è campato esclusivamente di soldi erariali. Ma pure lo studio di settore arriva dove può arrivare; sì, funziona bene se il fetentone guadagna meno del previsto; tanto lo tartassiamo e compensiamo a babbo morto. Ma metti che uno guadagna più dello studio di settore e non dichiara? Il fetentone ci frega. Bene, allora, zacchete! Lo spesomentro! Ci infiliamo nel conto corrente, nella carta di credito, casella postale, dove va, chi frequenta…incrociamo tutto e vediamo cosa compra.

Vediamo vediamo. Toh, questo  paga i broccoli 2€ al chilo, il doppio del mercato, eh eh, questo ci frega! Maresciallo, cartella!

E guarda questa! 50€ per un vibratore, quando su Ebay si trovano a 30. Maresciallo, cartella!

E questo? Operaio in cassa integrazione e spende 130€ per la collezione deluxe di Rocco? Maresciallo, cartella! Gliela faccio passare io la voglia de pippe!

Eh…però pure con lo spesometro, non è che risolvi. Sì, ti fai un po’ di cazzi di tutti, ma non tutti i cazzi di tutti. Solo alcuni. Metti che uno va a farsi una fuitina, magari in un alberghetto di provincia…con la collega, e magari pensa;

adesso pago in contanti che se mia moglie legge albergo diurno e pranzo per due…Eh, cornuta un poco, ma scema no!

E noi lo becchiamo: pagamento elettronico obbligatorio! E così abbattiamo pure il tasso di cornificazione, che non è bello, diciamolo!

Facciamo tutto per il vostro bene, italiani, pardon, italioti! Non dovete neanche fare il 730, non siete contenti? Tutto precompilato, vi diciamo tutto noi, sappiamo già tutto.

Per beccare i grandi evasori, ovvio. Perché si sa; i grandi evasori fanno la cresta sulla spesa. Togliamo il contante di mezzo, e vedrete che li becchiamo tutti. E l’Italia riparte; più benzina … e l’Italia riparte, anche senza motore e ruote. Più tasse, perché le tasse non si discutono, e nemmeno la spesa pubblica; che veramente vuoi licenziare un dipendente pubblico; o abbassare qualche stipendio?  o ritoccare qualche diritto? Non scherziamo.

E se non becchiamo i grandi evasori, amen. Becchiamo comunque i grandi coglioni, che ormai sono decine di milioni.

Grazie italiani per la fiducia accordataci. Lo facciamo per voi, perché di voi non ci si può fidare.

Accordateci ancora la fiducia. Ai più fedeli, 80€. Partita di giro, s’intende.

Siamo una grande famiglia e l’erario vi  è fratello.

Un vero Grande Fratello.images

Russia invaded Ukraine. Putin busted!

Fellow Americans, dear Europeans, comrades, civilized people of the free world. Our Ukrainian friends are under siege, a siege sized by the evil Zar.

Andrey Lysenko, a member of the patriots that liberated Kiev from the Russian puppet, bringing prosperity, unity and foremost freedom, has once again news for us.

Lysenko is one of our most reliable sources, a trusted friend, with a successful track record of spotting enemies; we call him with code name “Eye of the Lynx” or more simply “The lynx”.

The Lynx in August revealed to the world of the free, that the liberation army had just destroyed an invading Russian convoy! The liberation army, fortunately, wiped out completely the enemy. A severe lesson for the evil Russians; the enemy was defeated, destroyed, disintegrated, annihilated, so much that it was then not anymore possible to provide evidences of the convoy itself.

But here we come again!

The Lynx has once again done his job. He intercepted a new evil Russian convoy invading Ukraine with 32 tanks, 16 howitzers, 30 trucks of ammunition, and radar equipment.

t72b_minsk_parade_may_2005_1_2

This time Russia is deploying also some of his most advanced weaponry, featuring the AWT-32/TY tank, invisible to radars, but not only that. It features a worrying stealth technology that makes it almost invisible also to human sight.

Here a picture of the tank with the stealth technology switched on:51cdc30869629c8633000012

Here a picture of the tank with the stealth technology switched off:51cdc30869629c8633000012

So far with the verified facts.

While it has yet to be confirmed, some of our “sources” believe that some tanks were waving black flags, reminding ISIS’s ones. Other sources, we can’t disclose, also mentioned the presence of Sirian and Iranian personnel in charge of manouvring a balistic truck with the following misterious sign: radio_2370271b

Other two trucks showed the following flags:

chinese-flag-graphic

kplarge

This is a time in which people of the civilized and free western world must stay united; we want you to resist the propaganda of the invaders; and then fight them back until freedom and pipes will finally be secured.

This message was brought to you by Radio Pentagon. Nothing we do would be possible without the proud support of our platinum sponsors: Lockheed Martin, Exxon, Chevron, CNN, UN, FMI, World Bank, USAID, CFR, NATO

Support us, support freedom, buy their products.

END of MESSAGE – CODE 201fr242faa/888/3212 – Radio Pentagon

#Ebola going down, fear remains high

This is a short update on Ebola. The count of cumulative cases has increased, of course, moving from 9900 (19th of October) to 13000 (2nd of November); the number of “confirmed cases, is anyway lower and it is around 8000, and the difference is due to the accounting that takes in consideration also “probable” and “possible” cases, of which only a minority actually happens to be “confirmed Ebola cases”; please read the previous posts to understand why and how.

That being said, even if the cumulative count has increased, obviously, the trend is decreasing as also the WHO is admitting in his latest buletin.

5nov

The overall figure of new weekly cases across the three Countries (S.Leone, Guinea, Liberia) anyway has stabilized and going down, and it is now around 400. In Guinea the trend is stable and below the 100 quota.

guinea % Nov

In Liberia the trend is in “dying” tail.

liberia 5nov

In Sierra Leone still the count is high but it is appearing evident it has surpassed its peak value and is going gradually down.

sierra 5nov

I suppose you have not received this news by the media, fear is business.

#GamerGate and the Pandora’s Box

Yes, even if you are not a “gamer”, even if you despise videogames, still the “gamer gate” matters to you.

If you are familiar with GamerGate, you can skip this part and move below to the next section of this post, the “Pandora’s Box”. If not, the “GamerGate”, in short and admittedly with oversimplification, it is about the attempt by some people in the gaming ecosystem, to take over journalistic integrity and to introduce an ideological perspective into the gaming business. These ideologues stem from the belief that the gaming business, currently male “dominated”, perpetuates gender stereotypes, enables misogyny, and makes games hostile to potential female audience and developers. In essence, to them, female game developers are entitled to “free passes” in the gaming business, and games have to be scrutinized and reviewed by a feminist perspective.SONY DSC

When this stuff was first uncovered, many gamers, and even some professionals of the gaming industry, exposed the “conspiracy”, and the hashtag #GamerGate was born. The outrage was not only raised by the undermining of journalistic integrity, there was more. “Gamers” were painted as a sort of distributed group of psychopathic individuals, addicted to misogyny. They were not anymore the main stakeholders of the business, but a sort of social psychology target. Quoting the emblematic words of one of these ideologues: “gamers are over“. A superior ethical playground had to be deployed by Social Justice Warriors (SJW); crusaders waging a war under the flag, as it soon became clear, of radical feminism.

The “grassroots” of GamerGate, the gamergaters, grew exponentially; they exposed the lies, the non-sense and the inherent anti-male bias of the “conspiracy” plan. Some of them, saddly, decided to engage in a personal battle with the most prominent SJWs, and someone decided to address them also with “virtual” threats. A  SJW, unable to grasp the relation between insulting hundreds of millions of people and getting back harsh reactions from a dozen of them, made even more clear her ideological standpoint; the problem was not the game but the dominant demographic behind the game:

We need to seriously address connections between violence, sexism and toxic ideas of manhood before boys and men commit more mass shootings.

and

Not a coincidence it’s always men and boys committing mass shootings. The pattern is connected to ideas of toxic masculinity in our culture.

The mass media, as expected, sided with the SJWs, hiding facts, twisting the real matter of concern of gamers, and giving unilateral “prime time” to Social Justice Warriors instead of hosting fair debates. The bias in media made clear, if ever needed, the intimate and suspicious relation between SJWs and the media.

This is, to make a long story short, the development of the GamerGate during the last two-three months.Pac_Man_Wallpaper

Actually, to be even more accurate, the GamerGate started well before the fall of 2014, long before the hashtag was coined. Three years ago, already, some SJWs launched a campaign to tackle misogyny in multiplayer games; according to them, if a woman gets an occasional stupid or offensive comment in a multiplayer gaming session over the Internet, it is widespread misogyny; female gamers, naturally, deserved special protection rules on top of those already existing in gaming moderation for normal people. And just few months after that, a prominent SJW launched a campaign to tackle stereotypes in video games; games were, in her opinion, demeaning of female empowerment and they encouraged the misogynistic attitude of male population. This representation of “truth” came from a SJW who was neither a gamer or a game developer.

Now, you should have a wider, even if superficial, knowledge of the #GamerGate.

The Pandora’s Box

That being said, why should GamerGate matter to you, even if you are not interested in videogames? Even if you hate videogames? Even if you despise just the idea of a dude wasting time with a console?

Surely, you should worry about media corruption, because it is a thing, but there is much more than this. Gamergate is serious stuff because it opened the “Pandora’s box”; in the box there is much more than games, there is social profiling, social engineering, megalomania, and foremost, misandry.

Radical Feminism has taken over social studies in the academia, especially in the USA, becoming a cult based on the disdain of male identity. With a declared enemy: masculinity. Most of religions are based on a benevolent God; this cult is based on a malevolent one, an Evil, which embodies in male population in the form of “toxic” or “hegemonic” masculinity.

But do not be fooled; the “toxic” masculinity is just a moving target, to divert ingenuous people from the real declared enemy, the male identity. It is as simple as that.sin

Being male is the “original sin” of this cult; it is no wonder, then, to hear the male adepts often apologizing for their “privileged” status of heterosexual male; or even worse, “white heterosexual male”. It is the initiation ritual male adepts play to be recognized by the sisterhood; and it has to be periodically renewed, to confirm their belonging, to exorcise their demon inside.

This is a war on women in gaming waged by a group of sexist monsters. If you are not a horrible being, get out of #gamergate now

It is the reply by a SJW to a gamer. It is a war between monsters, or horrible beings, against humans. It is an ethical battle against the evil, a crusade; “either you are with us or you are the enemy”.  At least to me, it reminds the words of Obama (and Bush before) sanctifying the crusade against ISIS for the sake of “our common humanity”. An epic battle between humans and not humans.

Feminism’s adepts have being operating for decades, unchallenged, in the academia, in the media establishment and even in many national and extra national organizations, such the UN.

As the group identity of feminism developed, masculinity became an enemy far beyond the battlefield of games. The “idealization” process of the “masculine” evil has grown hyperbolically; it is worth to quote a statement form an EU research on Social Science and Humanities dated 2004, a work realized by feminist scholars and financed by the EU commission, titled “The Social Problem of Men“:

The EU can be understood as a project devised to reduce men’s historical tendency to nationalistic conflict and war, and so achieve relative stability in Europe. There is indeed increasing recognition of the central place of men and masculinity in the collective violence of war.

Masculinity is not an enemy, it is THE final enemy.

This crusade is beyond insanity. It is megalomania. It is about a pervasive social conditioning of men and boys. It is about psychic manipulation of infants with the introduction of the “gender ideology” during the early stages of education. It is about manipulating minds and criminalizing natural tendencies, in order to stimulate a self-inhibition. Brainwashing children outside the reach of the family; a family already framed as an adverse institution that poses the risk of replicating gender roles, and facilitating the contagion of the “toxic” masculinity.

At the root of sick forms of social engineering is the natural tendency of people in position of power, to project own personality and experience into others; it is egomania. When these people with high decisional (financial, academic, political) power endorse an ethical doctrine, chances are that their egomania will translate into megalomania.

The megalomaniac process of social engineering follows four stages; it starts with social profiling of adults; then it moves to indoctrinating young people, thus to brainwashing children, and finally to the non-yet born people, with adoption of bio-genetics or selective reproduction.arancia-meccanica-scene-1

It is a path which, ultimately, leads to eugenics.

History repeats itself, cyclically, in different yet similar forms, simply because the engine that moves individuals and groups, at the core, does not change. Eugenics was widely adopted in Europe and USA, less than a century ago (abolished in Sweden in 1974). It was legal because it had both “ethical” and “scientific” support. The road of “ethics” idealizing a society with “better people” crossed the road of science busy in defining relations between “unwelcome social traits” and biological factors; at the crossroad, it was “selection of the species”. Minorities and people affected by hereditary diseases were profiled and brainwashed to lead them on the way of “spontaneous” sterilization; a “compassionate” way of preventing the sufferings of unwelcome new-borns. The “evil” was not intentional; to eugenicists it was all about avoiding the suffering of “inferior” beings in a society designed for others. It was sincere kindness, in sick minds.

If we cannot modify society, maybe we can modify the people; why not? Quoting once again a passage of the EU research mentioned above, “The Social Problem of Men“:

Changing and improving gender relations and reducing gender inequality involves changing men as well as changing the position of women.

A very telling mission statement, aiming to change the position of women and, emblematically, assuming the possibility of changing men; “beings” reduced to disposable matter, to be customized in order to fit a society tailored on a gynocentric order.16328_012eugenicsexhibit

Eugenics is on the horizon.

Most likely you do not see this horizon approaching. We are all good people, we do not do such kind of things, except we already did them and we do them, and always for apparently good reasons, because we are good people.

Let’s go back 20 years ago, and imagine someone making the prediction that in 20 years schools would being teaching little kids that young males are not necessarily “boys” and young females are not necessarily “girls”; and family members opposing to this, threatened with allegations of “hate speech”. Would have you bet on this prediction?

Now let’s fast forward a couple of decades, and let’s imagine that “science” should tell us that the “gene” of violence has been identified and we have enough knowledge and technical means to intervene on that. How many will stand against it?

Scan the horizon.

Does gamergate itself deal with eugenics? No, of course not.

Do the Social Justice Warriors advocate for eugenics? No, of course not.

Do the feminists at the EU parliament, believing that masculinity is correlated to Climate Change, advocate for eugenics? No, of course not.

Do the feminist scholars aiming at “changing men”, advocate for eugenics? No, of course not.

Do the radical feminists dreaming of a reduction of male population, advocate for eugenics? Well, maybe they do.

Psychopaths apart, most of them are just “good people” who want to “manifacture” even better people. Some are stuck at social profiling, others proceeded to the next stages of social engineering; brainwashing and indoctrination. But they all, in good faith, do not realize the misandry of their argumentations. Not even the megalomania implied by their intents.

In a way, they just manifest a radical expression of a wider social trend; our “western” enlightened society is gradually shifting towards a new idolatry, based on the projection of a human kind gifted with “superior” ethical values.

It is the old recurring dream of a life in Eden. Except that the new “all mighty” to be worshipped, to many, has the appearance of a Goddess.